A prime reason for all the heated arguments among 9/11 truthers, as to the precise details of the 9/11 "attacks" (nukes vs. thermite, passenger jets vs. drones. vs. missles vs. CGI , nearly 3000 dead vs. mostly fictional "victims", Israeli spooks vs. USA spooks, etc.) is that A GREAT DEAL of the publicly available 9/11 evidence has either been tampered with or is the product of outright fabrication.
This very serious, perhaps intractable "evidence problem," as compellingly pointed out by the rival research teams led by Simon Shack and Phil Jayhan, would make building a courtroom-quality legal case against the real perps nigh impossible -- and they've been counting on that, ever since they first drew up their hideous, warmongering plans.
The "chains of possession" and "authentic sources" of much of the 9/11 record (photos, videos, witness statements, even "victim bios") have become so polluted with distortions, fraud and deliberate confusion that an international-consensus legal remedy someday (akin to the Nuremberg trials and subsequent perp-executions) -- when Russia/China presides over a defeated USA/UK -- could only be accomplished by the same Kangaroo-style, legal hijinks that indeed DID go on, in finally bringing the Nazis to the justice those murdering thugs so richly deserved.
But lest we gloat too giddily on this 70th Anniversary of the Omaha Beach Human Sacrifice Ritual, such justice did NOT come at the behest of opponents/victors whose OWN hands were very clean!
No comments:
Post a Comment