A prime reason for all the heated arguments among 9/11 truthers, as to the precise details of the 9/11 "attacks" (nukes vs. thermite, passenger jets vs. drones. vs. missles vs. CGI , nearly 3000 dead vs. mostly fictional "victims", Israeli spooks vs. USA spooks, etc.) is that A GREAT DEAL of the publicly available 9/11 evidence has either been tampered with or is the product of outright fabrication.
This very serious, perhaps intractable "evidence problem," as compellingly pointed out by the rival research teams led by Simon Shack and Phil Jayhan, would make building a courtroom-quality legal case against the real perps nigh impossible -- and they've been counting on that, ever since they first drew up their hideous, warmongering plans.
The "chains of possession" and "authentic sources" of much of the 9/11 record (photos, videos, witness statements, even "victim bios") have become so polluted with distortions, fraud and deliberate confusion that an international-consensus legal remedy someday (akin to the Nuremberg trials and subsequent perp-executions) -- when Russia/China presides over a defeated USA/UK -- could only be accomplished by the same Kangaroo-style, legal hijinks that indeed DID go on, in finally bringing the Nazis to the justice those murdering thugs so richly deserved.
But lest we gloat too giddily on this 70th Anniversary of the Omaha Beach Human Sacrifice Ritual, such justice did NOT come at the behest of opponents/victors whose OWN hands were very clean!
Friday, June 6, 2014
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
Why the NIST Cowards Punted
Cognitive-Dissonance impaired opponents of the Video-Fakery analysis of 9/11 invariably get hung up on a question such as this:
"Why in the world would anyone fake videos that show the official account of their collapse cannot be correct?"
Here's my answer:
A really effective psy-op needs a strong and long lasting EMOTIONAL PUNCH!!!
Network television's endlessly repeated, astonishing, CGI-fabricated videos of the top-down, descending-and-dissolving "Tower Volcanoes" (great term!) were intended to be far more spectacular, shocking and gut-wrenchingly memorable than would have been some genuinely live, close shots of the way each tower actually fell, mostly cloaked behind a massive smokescreen -- as the result of an actual, bottom-upwards, controlled demolition. (And how could the public, even as gullible as they proved to be, ever accept a bottom-up collapse being caused by a fire at the top?)
The decision to eventually assign NIST to "explain" the towers" collapse may or may not have been part of the original plan -- but hey, no matter!
What those much-credentialled, "scientific' experts were then confronted with was their "patriotic duty" to come up with a highly technical-sounding EXCUSE for the towers' inability to survive the very kind of damage they were purportedly designed to withstand.
And since attributing the buildings' collapses to violent, internal forces generated by ANY kind of pre-planted explosive devices would have been an IMPERMISSIBLE, even UNTHINKABLE HERESY, those NIST boffins were "boxed in" to a seemingly inescapable quandry.
So, after "dragging their feet" through a long series of delays, they finally decided to ignore BOTH the spectacularly false videos AND the institute's mandate to use them as "evidence" in explaining the destruction. Instead, those cowards-in-white-coats "punted," releasing a convoluted, tortuous and lengthy critique of the towers' alleged construction-design flaws -- a "study" that ends its timeline just as each collapse is about to begin its television-depicted, IMPOSSIBLE, free-fall descent.
And since the controlled media would, of course, brook NO serious questioning of NIST's suspicious avoidance of explaining the (occultically symbolic) 9- and 11-second "volcanic" freefalls, the perps could sleep well, knowing they got away with it.
"Why in the world would anyone fake videos that show the official account of their collapse cannot be correct?"
Here's my answer:
A really effective psy-op needs a strong and long lasting EMOTIONAL PUNCH!!!
Network television's endlessly repeated, astonishing, CGI-fabricated videos of the top-down, descending-and-dissolving "Tower Volcanoes" (great term!) were intended to be far more spectacular, shocking and gut-wrenchingly memorable than would have been some genuinely live, close shots of the way each tower actually fell, mostly cloaked behind a massive smokescreen -- as the result of an actual, bottom-upwards, controlled demolition. (And how could the public, even as gullible as they proved to be, ever accept a bottom-up collapse being caused by a fire at the top?)
The decision to eventually assign NIST to "explain" the towers" collapse may or may not have been part of the original plan -- but hey, no matter!
What those much-credentialled, "scientific' experts were then confronted with was their "patriotic duty" to come up with a highly technical-sounding EXCUSE for the towers' inability to survive the very kind of damage they were purportedly designed to withstand.
And since attributing the buildings' collapses to violent, internal forces generated by ANY kind of pre-planted explosive devices would have been an IMPERMISSIBLE, even UNTHINKABLE HERESY, those NIST boffins were "boxed in" to a seemingly inescapable quandry.
So, after "dragging their feet" through a long series of delays, they finally decided to ignore BOTH the spectacularly false videos AND the institute's mandate to use them as "evidence" in explaining the destruction. Instead, those cowards-in-white-coats "punted," releasing a convoluted, tortuous and lengthy critique of the towers' alleged construction-design flaws -- a "study" that ends its timeline just as each collapse is about to begin its television-depicted, IMPOSSIBLE, free-fall descent.
And since the controlled media would, of course, brook NO serious questioning of NIST's suspicious avoidance of explaining the (occultically symbolic) 9- and 11-second "volcanic" freefalls, the perps could sleep well, knowing they got away with it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)