Cognitive-Dissonance impaired opponents of the Video-Fakery analysis of 9/11 invariably get hung up on a question such as this:
"Why in the world would anyone fake videos that show the official account of their collapse cannot be correct?"
Here's my answer:
A really effective psy-op needs a strong and long lasting EMOTIONAL PUNCH!!!
Network
television's endlessly repeated, astonishing, CGI-fabricated videos of
the top-down, descending-and-dissolving "Tower Volcanoes" (great term!)
were intended to be far more spectacular, shocking and gut-wrenchingly
memorable than would have been some genuinely live, close shots of the
way each tower actually fell, mostly cloaked behind a massive
smokescreen -- as the result of an actual, bottom-upwards, controlled
demolition. (And how could the public, even as gullible as they proved
to be, ever accept a bottom-up collapse being caused by a fire at the
top?)
The decision to eventually assign NIST to "explain" the
towers" collapse may or may not have been part of the original plan --
but hey, no matter!
What those much-credentialled, "scientific'
experts were then confronted with was their "patriotic duty" to come up
with a highly technical-sounding EXCUSE for the towers' inability to
survive the very kind of damage they were purportedly designed to
withstand.
And since attributing the buildings' collapses to
violent, internal forces generated by ANY kind of pre-planted explosive
devices would have been an IMPERMISSIBLE, even UNTHINKABLE HERESY, those
NIST boffins were "boxed in" to a seemingly inescapable quandry.
So,
after "dragging their feet" through a long series of delays, they
finally decided to ignore BOTH the spectacularly false videos AND the
institute's mandate to use them as "evidence" in explaining the
destruction. Instead, those cowards-in-white-coats "punted," releasing a
convoluted, tortuous and lengthy critique of the towers' alleged
construction-design flaws -- a "study" that ends its timeline just as
each collapse is about to begin its television-depicted, IMPOSSIBLE,
free-fall descent.
And since the controlled media would, of
course, brook NO serious questioning of NIST's suspicious avoidance of
explaining the (occultically symbolic) 9- and 11-second "volcanic"
freefalls, the perps could sleep well, knowing they got away with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment