Why the NIST Cowards Punted

Cognitive-Dissonance impaired opponents of the Video-Fakery analysis of 9/11 invariably get hung up on a question such as this:

"Why in the world would anyone fake videos that show the official account of their collapse cannot be correct?"

Here's my answer:

A really effective psy-op needs a strong and long lasting EMOTIONAL PUNCH!!!

Network television's endlessly repeated, astonishing, CGI-fabricated videos of the top-down, descending-and-dissolving "Tower Volcanoes" (great term!) were intended to be far more spectacular, shocking and gut-wrenchingly memorable than would have been some genuinely live, close shots of the way each tower actually fell, mostly cloaked behind a massive smokescreen -- as the result of an actual, bottom-upwards, controlled demolition. (And how could the public, even as gullible as they proved to be, ever accept a bottom-up collapse being caused by a fire at the top?)

The decision to eventually assign NIST to "explain" the towers" collapse may or may not have been part of the original plan -- but hey, no matter!

What those much-credentialled, "scientific' experts were then confronted with was their "patriotic duty" to come up with a highly technical-sounding EXCUSE for the towers' inability to survive the very kind of damage they were purportedly designed to withstand.

And since attributing the buildings' collapses to violent, internal forces generated by ANY kind of pre-planted explosive devices would have been an IMPERMISSIBLE, even UNTHINKABLE HERESY, those NIST boffins were "boxed in" to a seemingly inescapable quandry.

So, after "dragging their feet" through a long series of delays, they finally decided to ignore BOTH the spectacularly false videos AND the institute's mandate to use them as "evidence" in explaining the destruction. Instead, those cowards-in-white-coats "punted," releasing a convoluted, tortuous and lengthy critique of the towers' alleged construction-design flaws -- a "study" that ends its timeline just as each collapse is about to begin its television-depicted, IMPOSSIBLE, free-fall descent.

And since the controlled media would, of course, brook NO serious questioning of NIST's suspicious avoidance of explaining the (occultically symbolic) 9- and 11-second "volcanic" freefalls, the perps could sleep well, knowing they got away with it.

Another November Outrage

Now that we have been, once again, morally and intellectually outraged by yet another disgusting November avalanche of CIA/Mossad-influenced JFK "documentaries" polluting the various "non-fiction" cable-TV channels, let's take a wider look at the possibly interlocking agenda items ALSO spewed forth by the producers and purveyors of all this Discovery Channel/History Channel/Military Channel/National Geographic Channel, etc. SLIME and SLEAZE:

I would say it behooves us to consider that the very same "nonfiction" channels that keep laying it on thick with "Oswald-the-lone-nut" AND "Osama-toppled-the-towers" pseudo-documentaries, month after month and year after year, are ALSO the very same channels that keep bombarding viewers with a seemingly endless stream of "Ancient Aliens," "UFOs piloted by ETs" and "Masonic Symbolism/Ancient Egypt" propaganda -- for literally hundreds of hours each year.

Esotericists Picknett and Prince nailed this booga-booga intel-agency scam shortly before 9/11 occurred, when they published their still-in-print, covert-op expose' book titled "The Stargate Conspiracy". Distressed as these seemingly sincere occultists were to discover that today's covert-ops spooks have been "co-opting" the ancient gods of Egypt all over the place in the post-Roswell era, the offended authors warned of more bizarre deceptions, drenched in occult symbolism (as 9/11 was soon to be) yet to come -- conjured up from the bowels of Langley, Tavistock, etc.

So... could the covert-ops boys' NEXT CGI-powered false flag be a (simulated) attack-saucer, heading straight for the White House -- or maybe the UN headquarters? Is that what it would take to seriously frighten and forcibly unite the recalcitrant governments of the world (under a "benevolent" new leader, of course) to do ultra high-tech battle with an utterly terrifying THREAT FROM SPACE???

Sound too far-fetched for serious consideration?

Then just remember Ronnie Ray-gun's "slip of the tongue" about fighting a literal "Star Wars" someday against invading ETs. And long before that curious pontification, General Macarthur was quoted to similar, suspicious effect.

Kinda reminds me of that alleged "Three World Wars" prophecy attributed to a certain, 19th Century general whose Washington D.C. statue gets picketed regularly by the LaRouchies.

(But the Potomac pigeons do a much better of job of dissing it with their droppings, IMHO.)